The Maanga

7 Responses to “About speaking for oneself”

1. kundi Says:
   May 12th, 2008 at 12:37 pm

   yena, avan oru kundi.
   athu naala ivalo blabber.

   neega athu pathi worry pannathinga, just concentrate on your brahmanical duty: to puke at adharmam.

2. harini calamur Says:
   May 13th, 2008 at 3:32 am

   
   everyone is a Hindu —including an athiest (there is a whole branch of athiest philosophy in what is popularly called Hinduism ) !
   now answer a question - why would ‘god’ feel ashamed /modest of/about his/her body and want to cover it up ?

3. Rules_Ramanujam Says:
   May 13th, 2008 at 3:48 am

   Regardless of what this guy says (assuming he is blabbering), first of all “judiciary - heal thyself”, before issuing opinion on something that affects a lot of people. By that I mean your venerable “contempt of court” provision. If that can be scrapped, then we can talk about freedom of expression of everyone, including artists.

4. Nilu Says:
   May 13th, 2008 at 3:49 am

   Sex in the heavens has long been a fantasy.

5. froginthewell Says:
   May 14th, 2008 at 3:20 am

   So Harini, when the Prophet Mohammed cartoons appeared you criticized the editors as irresponsible. And in this case only Hindus are to blame?

   Arun Shourie was right - if Hindus are kicked around, violent backlash is inevitable. Unacceptable but inevitable.

   Nilu can be forgiven - he is only puking not fomenting hatred. Your writing on the other hand is full of hatred. You seek to cure hatred with ( verbal ) hatred.

   ( Your argument “Why should God be ashamed” is as silly as the argument against idol worship that God is infinite : these notions are meant to be for people, not for God ).

6. Nilu Says:
   May 14th, 2008 at 4:24 am

   froginthewell, thank you for forgiving me.

7. Sandeep Says:
   May 16th, 2008 at 2:48 am

   Thanks Nilu, for featuring me.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website