About elections
Thursday, March 20th, 2008Wealth, like other segments of the evolutionary construct, is still largely a function of chance. Not change.
Wealth, like other segments of the evolutionary construct, is still largely a function of chance. Not change.
Reading idiotic opinion on the American primaries fueled one’s interest in other countries’ politics. The Russian elections were the ideal antidote. The Putin Project, which was aired on BBC’s SW service provided a reasonably lame and yet much better coverage that helped one beat Madras’ traffic and the Americanisation of stupidity[1].
Russia always makes me wonder: did not the Soviet Union supposedly achieve great results in education? Weren’t we always told that through NCERT text books? Whatever happened to all those well educated people? Surely, a country with a smart population can’t falter this long and so clumsily.
[1] — Think Amit Varma. A person who neither lives in America nor is he a citizen of that country. I don’t even think he has lived in America for a reasonable length of time in the past. And, he pretends to be obsessed with that nation’s primaries — not even the actual elections. There was an election in Meghalaya, just in case one needs perspective.
I tend to agree with P Sainath and Jagadguru.
Vietnam at least had its women. And children. Walter Sobchaks of the Free Market prism only have wasted bandwidth and deforestation to show. I have now decided to blame Dominic Wilson and Roopa Purushothaman for this.